WIND ENERGY NSM 21 (PROTOTYPE 2)

October 3rd, 2009 by Discuss this article »
mehmetogluenergy asked:


This project is based on regular wind energy turbines in combination with the magnus effect. The real trial prototypes are still in construction. No external energy is given to this turbine. A worldwide patent application is now in progress. Everyone who is related in this field is invited to share your thoughts and ideas with us. For more informations click www.mehmetoglu.com

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google
  • LinkedIn
  • Live
  • MySpace
  • Propeller
  • Socialogs
  • Technorati
  • Wikio
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • YahooMyWeb

25 Responses Add your own

  1. dudemanguyperson42 says:

    damn straight XD

  2. DominickBlack says:

    HAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!

  3. MrWalleye says:

    mezzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzmerizing…………..

  4. canonphoto says:

    goyherder I like your thinking! A whole lot of wasted energy. Could set up a college fund for them if you gave them a % kickback on what is sold to the grid.
    2 problems solved!

  5. goyherder says:

    attach those flashlight shake generators to the dominant arm of each teenage boy in America and you have your energy problems solved, with a lot leftover for turd world countries.

  6. scientificallygreene says:

    Hey, check out my website at ScientificallyGreener(Dot) com and get all the new and improved Equipments to build or buy your own solar and wind energy systems ScientificallyGreener(Dot) com is a website that sells the most modern environmental products available

  7. IIB20VTEC says:

    “can get”…..Gillette, the best a man can get

  8. jheredi84 says:

    Gillette… the best a man can have!!!

  9. MrMusician100 says:

    i prefer, the normal one, they loo
    k less ugly

  10. PornFlakes21 says:

    Looks like a francy Shaver…YOU TAKE ONE STROKE..IT TAKES THREE!

  11. ccalvinn27 says:

    its neat but creepy at the same time lol and its waay to bulky.. get it to slice through the air without making a sword out of the blasted thing…

  12. StapledNote says:

    Kids would find that scary

  13. drcaos says:

    Who is talking about enviroment?
    Birs + gears (or something rotating like a turbine) = problem
    ;)
    And no… the nuclear power it´s only amazing for my grandma.
    2 super sources of energy:
    Hydrogen and Heat…
    (yes, heat, and Im not planning to explain the concept)
    Ta Ta

  14. upajos says:

    Note the summary at the upper right of your screen, then look up “Magnus effect” in Wikipedia.

  15. upajos says:

    Careful! It seems you’ve been drinking just a little too much of that environmentalist Kool Aid!

  16. Teratornis says:

    It’s like David MacKay says in his video and book: if people want the lights to go on, they cannot be against every single form of power generation.

    The Chinese don’t seem to have a problem with wind-NIMBYs. They more than doubled their installed wind power capacity each year from 2005 through 2008 and will nearly double it again this year to over 20 GW.

  17. upajos says:

    It’s even worse than you say. In California, land of Luddite loonies, they’re dismantling hydro projects and preventing construction of new ones or even upgrades of existing ones to protect some species of non-native fish, frog or whatever. The push is for wind and solar, so our lights go out at night and when the wind stops blowing. Now the nuts complain that windmills are “too loud” and that they “kill birds”. Madness.

  18. Teratornis says:

    Actually large scale hydro has been the cheapest source of electricity for last 100 years. A hydro plant repays its investment cost within 10 years and then gives nearly free power for another 90 at least. Plus it is dispatchable. The main drawback is the very limited number of acceptable sites for large hydro dams. China had to move 1.2 million people out of the way to make room for Three Gorges. They can do that in China. No way in the US.

  19. upajos says:

    Nuclear power costs have been artificially inflated due to politics in most countries. The actual cost to the end user, including a comfortable profit for the power company, comes to less than $0.02 per kilowatt-hour, and there’s NOTHING on Earth that can compete with that, either now or in the foreseeable future. You’re the ignorant one, baur02: Wind power has been used for thousands of years, but has been largely abandoned since more reliable sources were developed in the Industrial Age.

  20. baur02 says:

    alright then you pay a premium for your electricity. the only thing holding wind power back is ignorant people who dont like change. every form of power came through these phases, even your precious nuclear. so relax, step back and appreciate that people are trying to make a difference for the now and futur.

  21. upajos says:

    No matter how fancy the wind turbine is, it stops generating when the wind stops blowing. I like my lights, my computer, my entertainment systems and my electric appliances to work even at night when there’s no sun and no wind. Germany is seriously reconsidering their foray into wind power now due to cost and reliability problems. The only solution for the long term is nuclear power.

  22. chavenor says:

    Well some of the best ideas came from the failures of others. So take it easy.

  23. velveetaslingshot says:

    It looks like a good idea, but I wouldn’t be surprised if the math involved proved it to be less energy efficient than a regular turbine with straight blades.

  24. TelfLad says:

    Only retards fall for this shit

  25. GreenEnergyToday says:

    I suggest that you build one yourself. Building your own wind turbine is actually a lot easier than one could imagine. You can contact me if you have any questions.

Leave a Reply